Skip to content
WebmasterID

Guided demo

Governance review

Walk an internal AI-inventory + source-backed due-diligence flow. Pick the use case, narrow a shortlist with verified citations, compare verification state side by side, then generate an evidence brief that lists every data gap and stale citation explicitly. The reverification queue is the natural next stop.

Workflow preview

Governance review

Server-rendered from current catalogue data. Each tile links to the live surface the demo walks through.

  1. Step 1 · use case

    Governance review

    Names the verified fields this workflow weights.

  2. Step 2 · shortlist

    11 candidates

    Deterministic order — no scoring.

  3. Step 3 · comparison

    4 models side by side

    Verified fields only — no derived metrics.

  4. Step 4 · brief

    6 evidence fields

    Markdown or JSON. Evidence, not recommendation.

  5. Step 5 · sources

    Citation registry

    Every value linked back to a primary source.

Verification status describes citations on a date — it does not assert regulatory compliance, certification, or fitness for any specific regulatory regime. The demo is a starting point for due diligence, not a substitute for legal or compliance review.

Steps

Step-by-step workflow

Follow the route plan below. Each step links to the live surface and explains what to inspect there.

  1. Step 1

    Read the use-case guide

    Name which verified fields matter for this workflow before picking candidates.

    /use-cases/governance-review

  2. Step 2

    Open the selection workspace

    Narrow a source-backed shortlist with the use-case filter pre-applied.

    /select?useCase=governance-review

  3. Step 3

    Compare verified fields

    Render the selected models side by side from the verified data layer.

    /compare/build?models=gemini-2-5-pro%2Cclaude-haiku-4-5%2Cclaude-opus-4-7%2Cclaude-sonnet-4-6&useCase=governance-review

  4. Step 4

    Generate an evidence brief

    Export a paste-ready evidence pack (Markdown or JSON).

    /briefs/build?models=gemini-2-5-pro%2Cclaude-haiku-4-5%2Cclaude-opus-4-7%2Cclaude-sonnet-4-6&useCase=governance-review

  5. Step 5

    Inspect sources + freshness

    Open every primary-source citation referenced by the selected models.

    /sources

  6. Step 6

    Open the reverification queue

    Walk every source due for manual re-check — useful for due-diligence flows.

    /reverification

Evidence preview

What the verified fields look like

Rendered for the 4 models included in this demo. Every value comes straight from the typed local data layer.

Governance review — verified fields

ModelLifecycleContextModalitiesHostedSourcesFreshness
Gemini 2.5 Proactive1,048,576text-in, image-in, audio-in, video-in, text-out—3Fresh
Claude Haiku 4.5active200,000text-in, image-in, text-out—2Fresh
Claude Opus 4.7active1,000,000text-in, image-in, text-out—2Fresh
Claude Sonnet 4.6active1,000,000text-in, image-in, text-out—2Fresh

Preview generated from current catalogue data. Every value is rendered straight from the verified data layer; unknown values stay null.

Decision brief preview

What the evidence brief produces

Server-rendered from the same helper that powers /briefs/build and /api/briefs/decision. Markdown + JSON export links are live.

Governance review — brief preview

Decision brief — Governance review

Generated at: 2026-05-24 · Use case: Governance review

  • Models

    4

  • Evidence rows

    32

  • Data gaps

    4

  • Sources

    3

Show selected models

Preview generated from current catalogue data. Briefs are evidence, not recommendations.

What this demo does not decide

  • Does not choose a model for you.
  • Does not rank models or providers.
  • Does not validate performance for your specific workload — run task-specific tests in your own environment.
  • Does not provide a live pricing quote. Pricing rows are source-backed references with freshness chips; re-verify against the vendor pricing page before commitment.
  • Does not certify compliance. Verification status describes citations on a date, not regulatory posture.