Skip to content
WebmasterID

Guided demo

Long-context analysis

Walk a long-context (≥200k-token) workload: pick the use case, narrow a shortlist by verified context window, compare the candidates side by side, and export an evidence brief. Pricing tier references for prompts >200k are flagged on the comparison; the brief surfaces every data gap explicitly.

Workflow preview

Long-context analysis

Server-rendered from current catalogue data. Each tile links to the live surface the demo walks through.

  1. Step 1 · use case

    Long-context analysis

    Names the verified fields this workflow weights.

  2. Step 2 · shortlist

    9 candidates

    Deterministic order — no scoring.

  3. Step 3 · comparison

    4 models side by side

    Verified fields only — no derived metrics.

  4. Step 4 · brief

    6 evidence fields

    Markdown or JSON. Evidence, not recommendation.

  5. Step 5 · sources

    Citation registry

    Every value linked back to a primary source.

Demo only — the catalogue does not assert which long-context model is best for any particular workload. Inspect verified context + pricing fields, then run task-specific tests in your own environment.

Steps

Step-by-step workflow

Follow the route plan below. Each step links to the live surface and explains what to inspect there.

  1. Step 1

    Read the use-case guide

    Name which verified fields matter for this workflow before picking candidates.

    /use-cases/long-context-analysis

  2. Step 2

    Open the selection workspace

    Narrow a source-backed shortlist with the use-case filter pre-applied.

    /select?useCase=long-context-analysis

  3. Step 3

    Compare verified fields

    Render the selected models side by side from the verified data layer.

    /compare/build?models=gemini-2-5-pro%2Cclaude-haiku-4-5%2Cclaude-opus-4-7%2Cclaude-sonnet-4-6&useCase=long-context-analysis

  4. Step 4

    Generate an evidence brief

    Export a paste-ready evidence pack (Markdown or JSON).

    /briefs/build?models=gemini-2-5-pro%2Cclaude-haiku-4-5%2Cclaude-opus-4-7%2Cclaude-sonnet-4-6&useCase=long-context-analysis

  5. Step 5

    Inspect sources + freshness

    Open every primary-source citation referenced by the selected models.

    /sources

Evidence preview

What the verified fields look like

Rendered for the 4 models included in this demo. Every value comes straight from the typed local data layer.

Long-context analysis — verified fields

ModelLifecycleContextModalitiesHostedSourcesFreshness
Gemini 2.5 Proactive1,048,576text-in, image-in, audio-in, video-in, text-out—3Fresh
Claude Haiku 4.5active200,000text-in, image-in, text-out—2Fresh
Claude Opus 4.7active1,000,000text-in, image-in, text-out—2Fresh
Claude Sonnet 4.6active1,000,000text-in, image-in, text-out—2Fresh

Preview generated from current catalogue data. Every value is rendered straight from the verified data layer; unknown values stay null.

Decision brief preview

What the evidence brief produces

Server-rendered from the same helper that powers /briefs/build and /api/briefs/decision. Markdown + JSON export links are live.

Long-context analysis — brief preview

Decision brief — Long-context analysis

Generated at: 2026-05-24 · Use case: Long-context analysis

  • Models

    4

  • Evidence rows

    32

  • Data gaps

    4

  • Sources

    3

Show selected models

Preview generated from current catalogue data. Briefs are evidence, not recommendations.

What this demo does not decide

  • Does not choose a model for you.
  • Does not rank models or providers.
  • Does not validate performance for your specific workload — run task-specific tests in your own environment.
  • Does not provide a live pricing quote. Pricing rows are source-backed references with freshness chips; re-verify against the vendor pricing page before commitment.
  • Does not certify compliance. Verification status describes citations on a date, not regulatory posture.